Skip to content
Home » 2 Witnesses In The Bible

2 Witnesses In The Bible

The concept of two witnesses plays a significant and intriguing role in the Bible. It is a recurring motif that symbolizes divine testimony, truth, and validation. In this blog post, we will explore the various instances in which two witnesses appear in the Bible, shedding light on their significance and the profound spiritual lessons they convey.

Churchgists has provided a well detailed information on the aforementioned and so much more. You will find these details very useful in whatever course you intend to use them for.

The Law of Two Witnesses:

The idea of two witnesses holds a special place in the legal and moral framework of the Bible. In the Old Testament, the requirement for two witnesses is explicitly laid out in passages like Deuteronomy 19:15: “A single witness shall not suffice against a person for any crime or for any wrong in connection with any offense that he has committed. Only on the evidence of two witnesses or of three witnesses shall a charge be established.”

The Testimony of Two Angels:

In the New Testament, we encounter the significance of two witnesses in the form of angels at the empty tomb of Jesus. In both Matthew 28:2-7 and Mark 16:5-7, two angels appear to validate the resurrection of Christ. Their presence and testimony serve as a powerful confirmation of the most profound event in Christian faith.

The Transfiguration of Jesus:

Another notable instance of two witnesses occurs during the Transfiguration of Jesus (Matthew 17:1-8). Two witnesses, Moses and Elijah, appear alongside Jesus on a mountain, affirming His divine nature and the continuity of the Old and New Testaments.

The Witness of Revelation:

The book of Revelation, in particular, features the concept of two witnesses prominently. In Revelation 11:3-13, two witnesses are described as prophets who testify before God, performing miracles and bearing witness to divine truth. Their ultimate fate and resurrection highlight the triumph of God’s purposes.

Spiritual Lessons from Two Witnesses:

  1. Validation and Confirmation: The presence of two witnesses in various biblical accounts serves to confirm and validate important events and truths, emphasizing the reliability of God’s Word.
  2. Continuity of God’s Plan: The appearance of figures from the Old Testament alongside Jesus symbolizes the continuity of God’s divine plan throughout history.
  3. Divine Testimony: Two witnesses embody the idea that God’s testimony is true, and He is the ultimate authority.
  4. Faith and Witness: The New Testament challenges believers to be faithful witnesses, just as the two witnesses in Revelation bear testimony to the truth.
  5. The Ultimate Triumph: The ultimate triumph of God’s purposes is evident in the resurrection and glorification of the two witnesses in Revelation, offering hope and assurance to believers.

2 Witnesses In The Bible

Numerous Christians through the ages have pondered who the “two observers” of Disclosure 11 end up being. The two observers are among the most sensational characters of Sacred text. They forecast before the world for three and a half years (1,260 days) (11:3). During this time, they can hit the earth with anything that plague they want, and can’t be hurt by their foes (11:5-6). Eventually, they are killed by the monster (11:7) however they ascend to life in three and a half days (11:11). How are we to comprehend the two observers and the surprising happenings encompassing their lives?

Is it true that they are two genuine individuals who forecast before Jesus’ return? Do they represent the congregation in a part of its gospel teaching? Observers have found Disclosure 11 very challenging to decipher and have distinguished the two observers in excess of twelve different ways. We should find out everything that the book of Disclosure says to us.

John doesn’t name or explicitly distinguish the two observers. Nonetheless, a few markers point the way towards basically their representative recognizable proof. Disclosure depicts the two observers as two olive trees and the two lampstands remaining before the Master (11:4). Of course, a Hebrew Scriptures section contains these pictures. Zechariah saw a dream of a strong gold lampstand with a bowl at its top containing seven lights. By the dishes, one on each side, were the two olive trees (4:2-3).

Zechariah requested the holy messenger for the personality from the two olive trees. The heavenly messenger’s response was: “These are the two who are blessed to serve the Master of all the earth” (4:14). That is, they are observers or prophets of God.

The subject of Zechariah’s book was a call to God’s kin to apologize (Zechariah 1:3). As did their old ancestors, the two observers wear unpleasant rough clothing, an identification of the workplace of a prophet who calls individuals to contrition. In old times, rough clothing was the piece of clothing portraying grieving and humility (Jeremiah 4:8; Matthew 11:21).

In Zechariah, the two olive trees stand adjacent to the lampstand that has seven lights. Disclosure utilizes a lampstand as an image of the congregation (1:20). Maybe John was attempting to let his perusers know that the two observers were to be related to the congregation, maybe as its agents or pioneers. Through them the heavenly light of God reflected by the chapels is made clear to the world (Matthew 5:15-16).

Moses and Elijah as models

It’s additionally conceivable that the two observers are emblematically demonstrated after Moses and Elijah. They “have ability to quiet down the sky so it won’t rain” (11:6). This power was related with Elijah, whose request caused a horrible dry season in Israel (1 Rulers 17:1).

Elijah’s deed was certifiable among Jews in the primary 100 years. James referenced the dry spell to act as an illustration of the force of an equitable individual’s request (James 5:17). He said that Elijah’s request caused a dry spell of precisely three and a half years — the time alluded to in Disclosure in different structures. Luke likewise alluded to the starvation in Elijah’s time, and said it had a length of three and a half years (4:25). Strangely, in 1 Rulers the hour of the dry spell is supposed to be “the following couple of years” (17:1) or around three years (18:1).

As did Moses, the two observers “have ability to transform the waters into blood and to hit the earth with each sort of plague” (11:6 with Mass migration 7:14-21). This reviews Moses’ job as God’s representative, who through ten infections — including transforming the Nile and the waters of Egypt into blood — cut down the most remarkable realm of the day.

Additionally, similar to Elijah, the two observers can consume their foes with fire, assuming that they attempt to hurt them (11:5 with 2 Rulers 1:10). This fire is said to “come from their mouths” (11:5). Such an exacting event would be an odd sight, without a doubt!

It appears to be clear, then, at that point, that the two observers are depicted as coming in the force of both Moses and Elijah, two of the best prophets of the Jewish country. The essayist gives off an impression of being making an emblematic universe for his perusers in which he is making an association between God’s demonstrations in Jewish history and through the congregation.

Strict or representative?
Maybe there is a strict perspective to the fire from paradise or different components, yet we can’t disregard their figurative importance. Fire coming from the mouth is an image utilized for strong teaching. The picture was utilized of Jeremiah’s seeing: “I will make my words in your mouth a fire and these individuals the wood it consumes” (5:14).

In any case, Jeremiah did no phenomenal works. He was a prophet who expressed God’s statement. That was the as it were “fire” that emerged from his mouth. He “tortured” Judah with his profoundly sharp words, which his listeners couldn’t bear.

We should be cautious, then, how we decipher the pictures of Disclosure. Is the proclaiming of the two observers the “fire” that “kills” their adversaries by being deplorable? Or on the other hand do they really call down genuine fire from paradise, which is said to come from their mouth — at their solicitation? (To rehash, it would be bizarre, without a doubt, in the event that genuine fire came from the mouth of two people. However, that would be the decision of an exacting translation of this picture.)

Anyway, the symbolism of Disclosure 11 is so painstakingly worked out to correspond with the most significant achievements of Elijah and Moses that it can’t be unintentional. John is giving his listener – perusers a message. At the point when you consider the two observers, consider Moses and Elijah.

For what reason would he say he was doing this? Here is one potential response. The Jews regularly expected that Elijah and Moses would some way or another “return” before the end-time (Imprint 9:11). This thought depended on Hebrew Scriptures texts. The prophet Malachi had written in God’s name: “I will send you the prophet Elijah before that extraordinary and appalling day of the Master comes” (4:5). Obviously, Jesus had proactively brought up that Malachi’s “Elijah” was an image for an extraordinary prophet, for this situation John the Baptist (Matthew 11:11-14). So had the Good news of Luke (1:16).

In this manner, the congregation ought to have grasped that “Elijah” had previously come, and he was emblematic of John the Baptist. Maybe, as a result of a Jewish reasoning in actuality, an inquiry concerning this had emerged in the congregation.

Similarly, the Jews anticipated that a Moses should come on the scene eventually (John 6:14). This thought might have come from Moses’ prediction of Christ (“I will raise up for them a prophet like you from among their siblings”), which was at times misjudged to allude to Moses himself (Deuteronomy 18:18).

Christ himself appeared to play on this significant imagery. It was Moses and Elijah who showed up with Jesus in the Change (Imprint 9:4). Obviously, the supporters who saw this connected the vision with the realm to come toward the finish of the age.

Why these two prophets?

In any case, why raise Moses and Elijah specifically, or by any means? We need to view the early Christian church as battling with Judaism over the inquiry: Who are the genuine individuals of God? The Jews anticipated that Moses and Elijah should show up before the realm could show up — and come to them since they were its kids. Due to this debate it was essential for Christ and the congregation chiefs to express something about these two Hebrew Scriptures monsters regarding their relationship to the congregation.

They inferred that these two prophets are to be related with the congregation and not with Judaism. The Stories of good news are quick to interface the prophets with Christ, not the Jewish specialists. Be that as it may, the inquiry — Who are the genuine individuals of God? — went on as the decades progressed.

Presently, somewhat recently of the principal century — with just John left of the first observers — what we could call the “last articulation” is made about this.

(Expecting a late date for the composition of Disclosure.) He comes to his meaningful conclusion by first connecting Elijah and Moses with the loyal church, and afterward by projecting the congregation in the picture of the two old otherworldly goliaths of confidence.

This is clearly a representative understanding of the two observers. Some, obviously, decipher the material in Disclosure 11 in an exacting matter. The two observers are supposed to be two people who will make genuine diseases. The issue is that this understanding requests that a genuine sanctuary should exist in Jerusalem, with penances being offered (11:1). There must likewise be a genuine sanctuary in paradise containing the ark of the contract (11:19). Exactly 7,000 individuals should be killed in a tremor (11:13). What’s more, fire should come from two human mouths (11:5).

A representative translation maintains a strategic distance from these issues of understanding. The sanctuary, for instance, could be the congregation and not an actual structure. For sure, that is the New Confirmation importance of the sanctuary. Could we not, then, additionally see the two observers as emblematic of — or possibly illustrative of — the congregation general in the end-time?

Disclosure pictures the congregation as a saint church. It is the spirits under the raised area — addressing the congregation — who were “killed on account of the expression of God and the declaration they had kept up with” (6:9). This is definitively what befalls the two observers — they are martyred for their declaration (11:7).

That the two observers are called lampstands demonstrates how Disclosure figures out their job. In the expressions of G.R. Beasley-Murray, “They address the houses of worship satisfying their business to demonstrate the veracity of Christ in the last season of adversity,” (The New Century Book of scriptures Editorial, “Disclosure,” p. 178).

Disclosure had proactively presented the saint Antipas of Pergamum (2:13). He was known as a “unwavering observer” and was a delegate of the congregation all in all who had stayed consistent with Christ’s name. Maybe that is the sense where we ought to figure out the two observers.

It appears to be conceivable, then, to make sense of the two observers as images of the seeing church. Surely, that was the job of the congregation in the times of the messengers. In view of the commission gi

Title: “Divine Testimony: The Role of the Two Witnesses in the Bible”


The concept of two witnesses in the Bible transcends mere legal or narrative elements. It is a profound symbol of divine testimony, confirmation, and the continuity of God’s plan. Whether it’s the legal framework of the Old Testament or the miraculous events in the New Testament, the presence of two witnesses serves as a reminder of the reliability and faithfulness of God’s Word. As we explore these instances and the spiritual lessons they impart, we are reminded of the unchanging truth and ultimate triumph found in the pages of the Bible.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *